Folly with backing fossil fuels

Why are we still subsidizing the fossil fuel industry?

As of July 2014, Oil Change International estimates U.S. fossil fuel subsidies at $37.5 billion annually, including $21 billion in production and exploration subsidies.

Other credible estimates of annual United States fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually – yet none of these include costs borne by taxpayers related to the climate, local environmental, and health impacts of the fossil fuel industry.

Fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S. also include massive military expenditures to acquire and defend fossil fuel interests around the globe, and infrastructure spending and related maintenance based on an antiquated energy system built on large, remote power plants and cheap electricity. Coal costs the U.S. $500 billion per year in health, economic, and environmental damage.

Today, we have much cleaner and economically viable sources of energy. Solar and wind power change the energy equation in the same way that digital cameras changed the film camera equation.

After you build a solar rooftop installation, the marginal cost of each additional unit of energy drops to zero because the sun and wind are free. Clean energy is about increasing returns on your investments. Fossil fuel industries are about decreasing returns. The more you pump, the less each well produces. The more you pump, the more each unit of energy will cost in the future. Unsubsidized solar is already cheaper than subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear power in hundreds of markets around the world.

Of course, the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow. Electric utilities deal with reliability problems constantly. When a large, 1,000-megawatt coal or nuclear plant goes down, there is a massive struggle to get backup power online to cover the loss. When the load goes down, they scramble to find places to dump the power as these large units are relatively inflexible. Having numerous small generators, spread over large areas, significantly reduces the impact of outages.

President Trump’s assaults on the EPA and environmental regulations are smokescreens for more subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. This will not make America great again. It will bankrupt the economy and leave the future to those that follow the economics of clean energy.

– Dan Streiffert

More in Letters to the Editor

Teachers need fair compensation

Why are we bargaining? Community members may be wondering why the Kent… Continue reading

Homework for ‘clueless’ city

The road to hell in Kent is paved with good intentions and… Continue reading

Development consuming East Hill

I moved to Kent in 1990 and enjoyed seeing all the open… Continue reading

Feeling isolated, frustrated on the West Hill

Congratulations, the mayor and the City Council, you have finally succeeded in… Continue reading

Let’s all share in the costs

The Kent Reporter is doing an outstanding job in providing news that… Continue reading

Property tax unfair to homeowners

Two recent tax increase levies have been strongly rejected. That is, 41… Continue reading

Thanks for clearing the way

I would like to give a big shout-out to the city of… Continue reading

Fund police without putting the burden on taxpayers

Kent voters overwhelmingly rejected higher utility taxes to fully staff the Kent… Continue reading

City needs to get a grip on its budget problem

In the State of the City address by Mayor Dana Ralph, she… Continue reading

Stop asking for more from those with less

I am a senior citizen and I voted, with reservations, for the… Continue reading

Join, continue to fight against Alzheimer’s

The Alzheimer’s Association 2018 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures report reveals that,… Continue reading

Backing our superintendent amid difficult times

I would like to express my support and appreciation to Kent School… Continue reading