Folly with backing fossil fuels

Why are we still subsidizing the fossil fuel industry?

As of July 2014, Oil Change International estimates U.S. fossil fuel subsidies at $37.5 billion annually, including $21 billion in production and exploration subsidies.

Other credible estimates of annual United States fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually – yet none of these include costs borne by taxpayers related to the climate, local environmental, and health impacts of the fossil fuel industry.

Fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S. also include massive military expenditures to acquire and defend fossil fuel interests around the globe, and infrastructure spending and related maintenance based on an antiquated energy system built on large, remote power plants and cheap electricity. Coal costs the U.S. $500 billion per year in health, economic, and environmental damage.

Today, we have much cleaner and economically viable sources of energy. Solar and wind power change the energy equation in the same way that digital cameras changed the film camera equation.

After you build a solar rooftop installation, the marginal cost of each additional unit of energy drops to zero because the sun and wind are free. Clean energy is about increasing returns on your investments. Fossil fuel industries are about decreasing returns. The more you pump, the less each well produces. The more you pump, the more each unit of energy will cost in the future. Unsubsidized solar is already cheaper than subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear power in hundreds of markets around the world.

Of course, the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow. Electric utilities deal with reliability problems constantly. When a large, 1,000-megawatt coal or nuclear plant goes down, there is a massive struggle to get backup power online to cover the loss. When the load goes down, they scramble to find places to dump the power as these large units are relatively inflexible. Having numerous small generators, spread over large areas, significantly reduces the impact of outages.

President Trump’s assaults on the EPA and environmental regulations are smokescreens for more subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. This will not make America great again. It will bankrupt the economy and leave the future to those that follow the economics of clean energy.

– Dan Streiffert

More in Letters to the Editor

Regional landfill: Building a waste-to-energy plant is a viable option

This is in response to the Sept. 7 Kent Reporter article, “King… Continue reading

Kent schools: Teachers are paid well enough

The base salary for a public school teacher in the Kent School… Continue reading

2018 elections: Dino Rossi owes an apology

The Sept. 7 issue of the Auburn Reporter included a letter by… Continue reading

What do the citizens of Congressional District 8 stand for?

It was disappointing to see Dino Rossi (like Dave Reichert) avoid constituents… Continue reading

’18 election: Rossi more equipped to work in Congress

If you want a strong leader in Congress who is a business… Continue reading

Kent schools: Take care of your heart, your teachers

The heart is the most vital organ. How you treat your heart… Continue reading

Cost of living: Seniors can obtain some tax relief

Gene Bremner, food for thought: I’m a senior in the city limits… Continue reading

Play review: Bravo to theater group’s production of ‘Alma’

I didn’t know about Theatre Battery until last Friday’s Page 1 story… Continue reading

Race for Congress: Schrier is a contradiction

Something has been bothering me. A pediatrician is supposed to be concerned… Continue reading

Cost of living: Seniors being thrown under the bus

More and more senior citizens are taxed out of their homes by… Continue reading

Statistics? Dangerous fireworks prevalent as ever

I read the article “A much quieter Fourth of July in Kent”… Continue reading

Kent dealing with frustrating traffic mess

I was taking 228th Street to go to work. When they closed… Continue reading