Folly with backing fossil fuels

Why are we still subsidizing the fossil fuel industry?

As of July 2014, Oil Change International estimates U.S. fossil fuel subsidies at $37.5 billion annually, including $21 billion in production and exploration subsidies.

Other credible estimates of annual United States fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually – yet none of these include costs borne by taxpayers related to the climate, local environmental, and health impacts of the fossil fuel industry.

Fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S. also include massive military expenditures to acquire and defend fossil fuel interests around the globe, and infrastructure spending and related maintenance based on an antiquated energy system built on large, remote power plants and cheap electricity. Coal costs the U.S. $500 billion per year in health, economic, and environmental damage.

Today, we have much cleaner and economically viable sources of energy. Solar and wind power change the energy equation in the same way that digital cameras changed the film camera equation.

After you build a solar rooftop installation, the marginal cost of each additional unit of energy drops to zero because the sun and wind are free. Clean energy is about increasing returns on your investments. Fossil fuel industries are about decreasing returns. The more you pump, the less each well produces. The more you pump, the more each unit of energy will cost in the future. Unsubsidized solar is already cheaper than subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear power in hundreds of markets around the world.

Of course, the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow. Electric utilities deal with reliability problems constantly. When a large, 1,000-megawatt coal or nuclear plant goes down, there is a massive struggle to get backup power online to cover the loss. When the load goes down, they scramble to find places to dump the power as these large units are relatively inflexible. Having numerous small generators, spread over large areas, significantly reduces the impact of outages.

President Trump’s assaults on the EPA and environmental regulations are smokescreens for more subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. This will not make America great again. It will bankrupt the economy and leave the future to those that follow the economics of clean energy.

– Dan Streiffert

More in Letters to the Editor

Trump to the rescue?

The president’s braggadocious blustering, trivializing the horrifying shootings at Florida’s Marjory Stoneman… Continue reading

Keep Kent safe, support Proposition A

National concerns about public safety, such as the Parkland, Fla., occurrence, simply… Continue reading

What do freedom, patriotism really mean?

In an effort to convince enough Americans to vote against their own… Continue reading

More can be done than just mental health

Regarding: “Local legislators hope to find property tax relief” (Reporter, Feb. 21),… Continue reading

‘Trump Peace Tower’: hope in diplomacy

President Trump quickly accepted Kim Jong Un’s invitation. Preparations are now underway… Continue reading

The wrong weapons

Your “letters” writers posited a strong belief that the solution to a… Continue reading

No to Kent Proposition A

The commentary from Andrea Keikkala’s “Support Proposition A for a safer community”… Continue reading

School levies needed? Yes

After reading the Jan. 26 letter to the editor, “School levies needed?,”… Continue reading

About that vacant old school?

The Kent School District (KSD) again seeks replacement levies to help fund… Continue reading

School levies needed?

The Kent School District recently sent out an email stating that with… Continue reading

Let’s toughen gun control laws

Over the past few years, guns have had a big effect on… Continue reading

End to DACA would be devastating

In just two months President Trump’s decision to end the DACA program… Continue reading