Folly with backing fossil fuels

Why are we still subsidizing the fossil fuel industry?

As of July 2014, Oil Change International estimates U.S. fossil fuel subsidies at $37.5 billion annually, including $21 billion in production and exploration subsidies.

Other credible estimates of annual United States fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually – yet none of these include costs borne by taxpayers related to the climate, local environmental, and health impacts of the fossil fuel industry.

Fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S. also include massive military expenditures to acquire and defend fossil fuel interests around the globe, and infrastructure spending and related maintenance based on an antiquated energy system built on large, remote power plants and cheap electricity. Coal costs the U.S. $500 billion per year in health, economic, and environmental damage.

Today, we have much cleaner and economically viable sources of energy. Solar and wind power change the energy equation in the same way that digital cameras changed the film camera equation.

After you build a solar rooftop installation, the marginal cost of each additional unit of energy drops to zero because the sun and wind are free. Clean energy is about increasing returns on your investments. Fossil fuel industries are about decreasing returns. The more you pump, the less each well produces. The more you pump, the more each unit of energy will cost in the future. Unsubsidized solar is already cheaper than subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear power in hundreds of markets around the world.

Of course, the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow. Electric utilities deal with reliability problems constantly. When a large, 1,000-megawatt coal or nuclear plant goes down, there is a massive struggle to get backup power online to cover the loss. When the load goes down, they scramble to find places to dump the power as these large units are relatively inflexible. Having numerous small generators, spread over large areas, significantly reduces the impact of outages.

President Trump’s assaults on the EPA and environmental regulations are smokescreens for more subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. This will not make America great again. It will bankrupt the economy and leave the future to those that follow the economics of clean energy.

– Dan Streiffert

More in Letters to the Editor

Online school keeps us sailing

We enrolled our son, Alex, in Washington Virtual Academy in Kindergarten (WAVA)… Continue reading

Homelessness requires care, accountability

Responding to Michael Colasurdo’s comments in a letter to the editor, “Stop… Continue reading

Brighter side of Trump

I agreed with much of a previous letter writer telling us how… Continue reading

Are Democrats ready for change?

There’s hardly any point of having a two-party system in theory when… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Trust in government

As of this writing, on Nov. 6, your City Council plans on… Continue reading

Thanks to all who supported pursuit of restoration grant for historic building

Kent Downtown Partnership would like to thank everybody who voted for the… Continue reading

Dino has my vote for Congress

Watching the debate between Dino Rossi and Kim Schrier on YouTube was… Continue reading

Don’t be misled, vote yes on I-1631

Let’s dig into the “special interests” that wrote and support I-1631. These… Continue reading

Race for Congress: Fresh Face vis-a-vis Old Pol

Electing Kim Schrier will bring to the office “pluses” sorely needed in… Continue reading

I-1639 is a bad law that attacks our rights

If you value your civil rights, then please vote no on I-1639.… Continue reading