Once more, with clarity on gun control

Solomon Hines should do some research on gun control legislation effectiveness. From Harvard, that bastion of extreme Ivy League liberalism, a study published in 2007 Harvard Journal of Law, Titled: Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?, found some surprising things. Here’s a link: beliefnet.com.

Excerpt:

When Kates and Mauser compared England with the United States, they found “a negative correlation, that is, where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are lowest, and where guns are least dense, violent crime rates are highest. There is no consistent significant positive association between gun ownership levels and violence rates.”

In 2004, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences released an evaluation from its review of existing research. After reviewing 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications and its own original empirical research, it failed to identify any gun control that had reduced violent crime, suicide, or gun accidents, note Kates and Mauser.

Anyone can do a Google search of the 10 cities with the highest gun violence rates in the U.S. There is one stark correlation; they are all under control of the Democratic Party for many years. They have some of the toughest gun control laws.

A criminal is one who breaks the law; therefore, a law does not affect a criminal. Enforcement of a law is required for the law to have an effect on a criminal.

“Criminologists of all political persuasions, in over a dozen studies,” writes Bach, “estimate that firearms are used for protection against criminals several hundred thousand to 2.5 million times per year, often without a shot fired.”

A gun control law only disarms law abiding citizens, not criminals. Murder is a far more serious crime than a gun law violation, so why do you think a gun control law would stop a murder?

– William Malinski

More in Letters to the Editor

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

Thanks to all who supported pursuit of restoration grant for historic building

Kent Downtown Partnership would like to thank everybody who voted for the… Continue reading

Trust in government

As of this writing, on Nov. 6, your City Council plans on… Continue reading

Support I-1631 for a healthier climate, brighter future

The article, “Report reveals inequities of climate change in Washington” on Oct.… Continue reading

Vote for less smoky days, yes on I-1631

Do you remember the smoke and haze from this summer? I sure… Continue reading

Fain supports the needs of our city, district

Sen. Joe Fain has been a champion for the city of Kent… Continue reading

I-1631 Opponents do not care about you or your family

In the Auburn Reporter, Don Brunell wrote a piece, “Carbon fee hurts… Continue reading

Fain has done so much for our community

Sen. Joe Fain has been and continues to be an active member… Continue reading

Hearing fallout: Democrats reveal their true agenda

Contrary to statements put forth by Rich Elfers in his opinion piece,… Continue reading

A costly initiative to consumers

You had better read I-1631 before voting. It is a never-ending tax,… Continue reading

Regional landfill: Building a waste-to-energy plant is a viable option

This is in response to the Sept. 7 Kent Reporter article, “King… Continue reading