School levies needed? Yes

After reading the Jan. 26 letter to the editor, “School levies needed?,” I did my own research and learned the letter was short on facts and extremely misleading.

Yes, the state is providing more funding to school districts, but it is also capping the funds that districts can raise locally.

In recent community meetings, district staff stated that starting in 2019 local property taxes will go down, and that is absolutely correct. In the current educational operations levy which expires in 2018, the Kent School District (KSD) is collecting $2.77 per thousand dollars of assessed value on a home. In 2019 and beyond, the state has capped that at $1.50/1000 of assessed value. Even if Proposition 1 passes (collecting $44 million in 2019) the school district will collect approximately $23 million less in local property taxes for the operations levy in 2019 than it will collect in 2018.

The statements about pay raises are not only wrong, they are extremely misleading. The letter states that teachers will receive a $10,000 pay raise, administrators a $33,000 pay raise and classified staff a $12,600 pay raise. Wrong. What’s the truth? The state will be contributing more to school employee salaries because the state currently underfunds these salaries. Current salaries are partially paid by the state and partially paid by local levy dollars. The state will now contribute more to the salaries, while local levies will contribute less. This is just one reason why the state has put a cap on what districts can collect from their local levies.

When you read that employees are getting huge raises from these levies, don’t believe it because it is not true. It will be the same, or very similar pay, just a different source.

Were the statements in the letter intentionally misleading or simply in error? We’ll never know. What is important is that voters have the facts when marking their ballots, not misleading information from an uninformed letter to the editor.

– Agda Burchard

More in Letters to the Editor

Why not investigate Joe Fain rape accusation?

The last two Auburn Reporters reported about the investigation into the rape… Continue reading

Homelessness requires care, accountability

Responding to Michael Colasurdo’s comments in a letter to the editor, “Stop… Continue reading

Brighter side of Trump

I agreed with much of a previous letter writer telling us how… Continue reading

Are Democrats ready for change?

There’s hardly any point of having a two-party system in theory when… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Trust in government

As of this writing, on Nov. 6, your City Council plans on… Continue reading

Thanks to all who supported pursuit of restoration grant for historic building

Kent Downtown Partnership would like to thank everybody who voted for the… Continue reading

Dino has my vote for Congress

Watching the debate between Dino Rossi and Kim Schrier on YouTube was… Continue reading

Don’t be misled, vote yes on I-1631

Let’s dig into the “special interests” that wrote and support I-1631. These… Continue reading

Race for Congress: Fresh Face vis-a-vis Old Pol

Electing Kim Schrier will bring to the office “pluses” sorely needed in… Continue reading

I-1639 is a bad law that attacks our rights

If you value your civil rights, then please vote no on I-1639.… Continue reading