When does the taxpayer and property owner get a break?

Using the Kent Reporter (April 6) and the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority’s Emergency Responder (Spring 2018), they want more money.

The city of Kent Proposition A is asking for a 2 percent increase on utilities taxes for the police department. We need more police to provide the services we need for a safe community, but questions are: when does this increase start, and how long will the increase be assessed?

Other questions: is the money intended for the police department, but, once in place, can the City Council take funds from it for other needs?

When the regional authority was formed the taxpayers were told it would be a money saver and provide better service. It appears our fire protection is spread out and cost more.

Why has the regional authority stepped out and started offering contract services? Isn’t this additional cost of manpower and equipment, and are those areas paying their share?

Looking at the “pie” chart the regional authority supplied, there is no mention of sub-contracts or any description/definition for the portions of the pie (2034 Calls for Good Intent, 725 Calls for Service). Are these really calls that require the fire department talent or are they the calls from medical clinics, home health care or retirement operations that don’t have enough staff?

The problem with false alarms is they require a response until determent “false.” Why aren’t repeated false alarms assessed a cost for poorly maintained equipment in place of the entire authority covering the cost?

Taxpayers, property owners and seniors have to live within their means, however, government staff and services seem to think there is a never ending money flow.

– Howard Lontz

More in Letters to the Editor

I-1631? Just another government money grab

I thought the Reporter did a decent job of breaking down the… Continue reading

Where are our leaders?

Our nation and the world cannot understand what is happening to the… Continue reading

Thanks to all who supported pursuit of restoration grant for historic building

Kent Downtown Partnership would like to thank everybody who voted for the… Continue reading

Trust in government

As of this writing, on Nov. 6, your City Council plans on… Continue reading

Support I-1631 for a healthier climate, brighter future

The article, “Report reveals inequities of climate change in Washington” on Oct.… Continue reading

Vote for less smoky days, yes on I-1631

Do you remember the smoke and haze from this summer? I sure… Continue reading

Fain supports the needs of our city, district

Sen. Joe Fain has been a champion for the city of Kent… Continue reading

I-1631 Opponents do not care about you or your family

In the Auburn Reporter, Don Brunell wrote a piece, “Carbon fee hurts… Continue reading

Fain has done so much for our community

Sen. Joe Fain has been and continues to be an active member… Continue reading

Hearing fallout: Democrats reveal their true agenda

Contrary to statements put forth by Rich Elfers in his opinion piece,… Continue reading

A costly initiative to consumers

You had better read I-1631 before voting. It is a never-ending tax,… Continue reading

Regional landfill: Building a waste-to-energy plant is a viable option

This is in response to the Sept. 7 Kent Reporter article, “King… Continue reading