Health isn’t just a personal choice

A recent study I read underscores the fact that good health isn’t just a matter of personal choice for Americans.

A recent study I read underscores the fact that good health isn’t just a matter of personal choice for Americans.

It’s tied – in some cases, painfully so – to income levels and geography.

Funded partly through Harvard University and the University of Washington, this study looked at death rates across the U.S. by county, for each year between 1961 and 1999.

It gave researchers a wakeup call, and it should be giving us one too:

That the United States, for all its advances in science and medicine, is increasingly populated by two very different groups – a wealthy class that has access to good health care, and a poorer class, which does not.

In some areas of the U.S. – chiefly the South, southern Midwest, Texas and areas of the Rocky Mountains – life expectancies actually have been going in reverse since the 1980s. And it’s the chronic, lifestyle-related diseases which are the culprits: high blood pressure, diabetes, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Women’s death rates since the 1980s also were increasing in these regions, researchers said, due to (again) chronic diseases that come from smoking and being overweight.

What did this lead researchers to conclude?

“The findings suggest that beginning in the early 1980s and continuing through 1999, those who were already disadvantaged did not benefit from the gains in life expectancy experienced by the advantaged, and some were even worse off.”

And they capped their results with this warning:

“The study emphasizes just how important it is to monitor health inequalities between different groups, in order to ensure that everyone – not just the well-off – can experience gains in life expectancy.”

King County actually did quite well in this study, with the third-highest increase in life expectancy in Washington.

But before we begin to pat ourselves on the back, we need to take a good look around us.

Good health costs money. It costs money to get a checkup; it costs money to eat well. Fat free isn’t free, folks.

And for all of its affluence, King County has a high number of poor and working poor – the numbers of which are climbing. Since the years of this study (which ended in 1999) those numbers have continued to grow. In 2004 alone, the number of King County residents living in poverty jumped to 10.4 percent, up from 7.3 percent the previous year. And the recent setbacks in our economy, coupled with increasing costs for everything from gasoline to bread, will push these struggling families even deeper into the well of poverty.

It’s a no-brainer that the first thing to go is preventative health care, when you can’t pay your bills. Medications also get rationed.

And don’t even think about shopping in the organic-food aisle.

Every day I see the struggles of families here in the Kent valley, where I live.

When you are hungry, you buy your food for calories and cost, more than nutritional content. It’s sad to see what’s rolling down the conveyor belt at the grocery store where I shop, and sadder still to see people digging through their purses and wallets attempting to pay for it. Sometimes, food gets put back.

And if hot dogs are going back on the shelves, it’s a safe bet that medications aren’t getting filled, either.

Which brings me to my original point: good health is more than just waking up one morning and deciding to eat healthier and to get some exercise.

It’s not just a personal choice.

It’s a choice that we as a society have to make.

It’s about making health care – and healthy food – accessible to all, regardless of their income levels.

When it comes to solutions, there is no magic bullet here. In fact, I’d love to hear solutions to this growing crisis – I’d be happy to publish them in the pages of this newspaper.

But I can tell you, the first step to this problem is looking beyond the daily grinds of our own lives, and considering the realities our neighbors must face.

The ones who don’t have jobs. The ones who are working multiple jobs in a desperate attempt to make ends meet.

We’re not really healthy until they are, too.

To learn more about the study, which is titled “The Reversal of Fortunes: Trends in County Mortality and Cross-Country Mortality Disparities in the United States,” please go to http://medicine.plosjournals.org.

Laura Pierce is editor of the Kent Reporter

More in Opinion

Trump helped erase voter complacency

Young voters turned out in massive numbers

Reporter cartoon, Frank Shiers
From guns to climate, declaring election’s winners and losers

A surge in voter interest, a swelling in the ranks of Democratic… Continue reading

Costs matter in hiring | Brunell

While both sides argue the merits of Seattle’s escalating minimum wage, there… Continue reading

Richard Elfers
‘Art of the Deal’ still key to understanding Trump

The book gave me a deeper understanding of President Trump and his unique style of leadership.

KCLS supports citizen engagement during election season and year-round

The first Tuesday in November is election day – a consequential day… Continue reading

Misleading and misdirection in election mailers is not new

The strategy is reminiscent of what Moxie Media did to unseat a state senator in 2010.

I-1631? Unfair, ineffective tax that costs too much, in return for too little

On election day, voters will decide the fate of Initiative 1631, which,… Continue reading

State taxed with the challenge of keeping up with a robust economy

Gov. Inslee: ‘Our revenue system is designed for a Model T economy in an Internet Age’

School is back in session, and KCLS is ready to help

It is fall and a busy time for teachers, students and parents.… Continue reading

Carbon fee hurts business and families | Brunell

Reduce pollution in our atmosphere without punishing workers and families

Boeing’s venture into hypersonic jetliners

Last spring, Boeing revealed its proposed hypersonic passenger airliner, which would fly… Continue reading