A tax by another name | Don Brunell

Washington voters have made it more difficult for state lawmakers to hike taxes by requiring a two-thirds majority to do so. The Legislature’s response? Increase fees, instead.

Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business. Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business.

Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business. Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business.

Washington voters have made it more difficult for state lawmakers to hike taxes by requiring a two-thirds majority to do so.

The Legislature’s response? Increase fees, instead.

Gov. Chris Gregoire has ordered state agencies to cut their budgets and streamline their operations, saying, “State government cannot conduct business as usual.” But instead, some agencies want to offset their agency’s budget cuts with higher fees.

Fee hikes require only a simple majority vote in the Legislature. As a result, lawmakers are considering $350 million to $450 million in new fees to help plug the budget gap.

But that’s not what fees are for. By definition, fees are charged to offset the cost of a specific government program or service provided in return for that fee. Hiking fees to replace money from the general fund is a tax by any other name.

Calling a tax a fee doesn’t make it so. In fact, Lt. Gov. Brad Owen has ruled that, “Calling something a fee when there is no nexus between its collection and how it is to be spent does not make it a fee. Failing this, it is a tax, and a supermajority vote is required.”

The governor has called on state agencies to reform, and opportunities for reform abound.

For example, one of the major costs for Washington employers is the overlapping and often contradictory layers of federal, state and local regulations and permits covering the same issue. Even regulations among state agencies often overlap, forcing companies to file two or three sets of different paperwork or studies and pay multiple fees for the same thing.

But no one is addressing this problem in a meaningful way. Instead, some bureaucrats and legislators just want to increase the fees for these duplicative permits.

Case in point: streams in forests. Currently, an applicant must file separate permits with two different state agencies to install a fish-passable culvert on private timber land. The permit for the Department of Natural Resources is highly detailed and covers a broad range of protections. A similar permit for the Department of Fish and Wildlife is less specific, more general in scope.

The DNR permit covers everything required by the DFW permit and more. Do we really need both? Is it really necessary that property owners file two sets of paperwork, pay two fees and support two sets of public employees to accomplish the same thing?

Another example: the State Department of Ecology.

DOE wants to increase fees for processing water rights permits. But the agency currently has a backlog of some 7,000 pending applications, half of which have lain untouched for 10 to 20 years. Of that number, the agency staff has processed about 370 applications over the past two years. Essentially, DOE wants permit applicants to pay more money, but receive no change in service level for the additional cost.

That is not reform. Fee hikes are simply an attempt to avoid necessary reforms, backfill budget cuts and circumvent the two-thirds majority requirement to raise taxes.

Why should the general public care? Because added costs reduce jobs. And that’s the last thing we should do as our businesses struggle to emerge from the recession.

For example, HB 2008, sponsored by Rep. Hans Dunshee, D-Snohomish, would increase fees on the timber industry. Sierra Pacific Industries has already laid off 1,000 employees to cut costs to remain competitive and company officials say Dunshee’s bill would further add to the size of government and increase fees by 12 times. Representatives of private forest owner Merrill & Ring said it had also cut costs, and it would be nice “if the state government would do the same thing.”

Exactly.

The governor has raised expectations that state government will be transformed. It will be more efficient and streamlined. The permitting process will be easier for all of us to navigate, and we won’t have to weave our way through the regulatory maze and pay a toll at every turn in the road.

She has veto power and ought to insist the Legislature and state agencies comply with the intent of her transforming state government initiative.

Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business.


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.kentreporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Business

A rendering of what a new manufacturing campus in Kent on the Naden property could look like. COURTESY IMAGE, Mortenson Development
Developer sees Naden property in Kent as prime location

Future manufacturing campus could be ‘catalyst for economic development’

Burlington will be opening this spring on the East Hill in Kent. COURTESY PHOTO, Burlington Stores
Burlington to open Kent store on East Hill near Target

Will feature discounted brand-name apparel and other items at former TOP Food and Drug store

United States Courthouse in Seattle. COURTESY PHOTO, U.S. Department of Justice
Man who stole from Kent company receives 18-month sentence

Information technology manager used scheme to steal nearly $1 million over 7-year period

t
Kent City Council approves sale of Naden property to developer

Minnesota-based Mortenson to pay $18.3 million with plans for manufacturing campus

New Shepard rocket. COURTESY FILE PHOTO, Blue Origin
Kent-based Blue Origin pauses New Shepard flight program

Company announces no tourist flights for at least two years; to focus on lunar program

COURTESY PHOTO, Kent Downtown Partnership
Kent Downtown Partnership offers facade improvement grants

Up to $20,000 available to impact Historic Downtown Kent District

t
Kent-based Blue Origin completes 17th human spaceflight

Company has flown 98 people into space as part of its New Shepard tourist program

t
City of Kent finds developer to purchase Naden property

Panel selects Minneapolis-based Mortenson to attract manufacturer

Jordon Marshelle Barrett was inspired to create her South King County-based non-profit The M.A.R.S.H.E.L.L.E. Project after a horseback riding retreat in Roy, Washington. Courtesy photo.
New equine nonprofit will foster healing horsepower

The M.A.R.S.H.E.L.L.E. Project is raising funds to provide equestrian experiences for local kids in the foster care system.

t
El Pollo Loco opens in Kent on East Hill

California-based Mexican restaurant along SE 256th Street features authentic fire-grilled chicken

t
Nana’s Southern Kitchen in Kent gives away 1,000 meals

Sixth annual Christmas Day event features free meals for those in need

Michaela (Michi) Benthausan on Dec. 20 became the first wheelchair user to fly above the Kármán Line, the internationally recognized boundary of space, during her flight on Blue Origin’s New Shepard. COURTESY PHOTO, Blue Origin
Kent-based Blue Origin flies wheelchair user into space for first time

Company senior vice president says flight demonstrates that ‘space is for everyone’