Clarifying city’s role as Prop A comes before voters

I have received a lot of questions in recent weeks from Kent residents who are unclear about the relationship between the city of Kent and the Kent School District. They are concerned about the school district’s direction. They are asking why the district is laying off employees after both of their levies passed, and they’re concerned the city will do the same thing if Proposition A passes.

First, I’d like to clarify that the city of Kent has no direct relationship to the Kent School District. While we appreciate their financial struggles, the Kent School District has its own elected board of directors, and the city has no control over their budget or the decisions they make in how to manage it. This includes the elimination of 45 positions announced in February or the 127 job cuts announced in March.

Second, I want to clarify questions I’ve received about Proposition A (KentWA.gov/PropA), the police and criminal justice ballot measure that will be on the ballot April 24. If Prop A passes, the city will increase utility taxes by 2 percent on electricity, manufactured and natural gas, telephone and cellphones and cable TV services. It is not a property tax, and it will impact those in Kent who use the utilities mentioned, including businesses.

The utility tax will raise approximately $4.8 million annually, and cost the average Kent household about $11 a month. This revenue will be used exclusively to pay for 23 commissioned police officers (21 patrol officers and two sergeants), two police corrections officers, two police records specialists, one prosecution attorney, one prosecution paralegal, one public defender, one judicial specialist and one probation officer. All funds received from the 2 percent increase in utility tax revenues will be segregated from other funds of the city and accounted for separately.

Public safety is the No. 1 priority for the city of Kent. If Prop A passes, we will not be laying off police officers. If Prop A doesn’t pass, we will not be laying off police officers. That is a promise.

– Mayor Dana Ralph

More in Letters to the Editor

Is our country safer loaded with guns?

I find it telling that Mr. Malinski’s May 24 letter (“Stricter gun… Continue reading

Time to act is now to save our planet

“Time is now to embrace Green New Deal” (June 7, Kent Reporter)… Continue reading

A costly effort

Green New Deal, right. Nothing “green” about it – a massive wind… Continue reading

Time is now to embrace Green New Deal

Climate change is happening here and now – recently with record fires… Continue reading

Leadership and homelessness

The KOMO special “Seattle is Dying” validates the homeless crisis. … ”Whether… Continue reading

Trump watch: investigate, don’t impeach him

I believe in investigating Trump. Congress must do this, but I don’t… Continue reading

Senator’s sorry remarks reflect divided Olympia

Sen. Maureen Walsh’s comment about nurses spending their day playing cards after… Continue reading

Really above the law?

Bob Roegner’s article (“Are sheriffs above the law?” Kent Reporter, April 12)… Continue reading

A thank you to Reichert, Schrier for supporting causes

Great to see former Congressman Reichert honored for his hard and often… Continue reading

Let’s look at a balanced, fair tax code

Washington tax laws are unfair and unproportioned. The 1 percent pay 3… Continue reading

Kent must do more to protect pedestrians

A mother who was walking with her two young children in a… Continue reading

Our system works better

A few quick comments about “What really defines socialist country,” a letter… Continue reading