I-1631 Opponents do not care about you or your family

In the Auburn Reporter, Don Brunell wrote a piece, “Carbon fee hurts business and families,” (Oct. 12), where he argues that cutting carbon emissions is a laudable goal, but that this particular carbon tax is too harmful to soccer moms, small produce companies and local supermarkets.

After surveying a series of inflated costs, Brunell concludes with the wish that backers of I-1631 consider revenue neutral proposals like I-732, the revenue-neutral carbon tax that failed in 2016. Yet the very organization that Brunell used to lead, the Association of Washington Business (AWB), ran a series of ads against I-732 that recapitulates – almost point for point – the same arguments Brunell makes against I-1631.

In short, no carbon tax exists that Brunell could support because he simply does not support actual, real carbon taxes and only raises other carbon taxes as a means to undermine the current proposals on the table.

Brunell and the AWB and Rob McKenna (Chevron employee) and the oil companies who are funding “no on I-1631” do not care about you, your family or the future of Washington state. They care about protecting their investments in dirty fossil fuels, and they care so much that they’re willing to let your child get asthma, watch peoples’ homes go up in smoke, poison the air and the earth, let the seas swamp historic Washington towns, and let famines and disasters kill millions of people around the world.

In November, we have the chance to create something different. I-1631 reorients our economy away from fossil fuels, placing a modest, but rising fee on fossil fuels (analysis suggests that the costs per family per month are around $10). We can grow an economy that’s not based on poison, but on electrification, clean energy, high tech and balancing our relationship with nature.

In short, there’s a future worth having. Don’t let the oil company profits and their paid stooges keep us from it.

– Nathan Schumer

More in Letters to the Editor

Vote yes for Medic One

On the Nov. 5 Ballot will appear “Proposition No. 1. Medic One… Continue reading

At the crossroads with a ‘roundabout’

Do you travel on Willis Street (State Route 516) to commute to… Continue reading

How will you vote?

It’s that time of year during which we are asked to vote… Continue reading

Michaud is the right choice for city council

Zandria Michaud’s top priorities as a Kent City Council member are public… Continue reading

Homeowners, don’t complain about living next to a racetrack

Please remember that Pacific Raceways existed before most of the houses that… Continue reading

Support Larimer for a promising future

Councilwoman Marli Larimer is the perfect City Council member for Kent’s youth.… Continue reading

Support our first responders, vote yes on Prop 1

We all depend on the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority to provide… Continue reading

Paying too much

Opening the July 12 edition of the Opinion page, I was surprised… Continue reading

Is our country safer loaded with guns?

I find it telling that Mr. Malinski’s May 24 letter (“Stricter gun… Continue reading

Time to act is now to save our planet

“Time is now to embrace Green New Deal” (June 7, Kent Reporter)… Continue reading

A costly effort

Green New Deal, right. Nothing “green” about it – a massive wind… Continue reading

Time is now to embrace Green New Deal

Climate change is happening here and now – recently with record fires… Continue reading