I-1631 Opponents do not care about you or your family

In the Auburn Reporter, Don Brunell wrote a piece, “Carbon fee hurts business and families,” (Oct. 12), where he argues that cutting carbon emissions is a laudable goal, but that this particular carbon tax is too harmful to soccer moms, small produce companies and local supermarkets.

After surveying a series of inflated costs, Brunell concludes with the wish that backers of I-1631 consider revenue neutral proposals like I-732, the revenue-neutral carbon tax that failed in 2016. Yet the very organization that Brunell used to lead, the Association of Washington Business (AWB), ran a series of ads against I-732 that recapitulates – almost point for point – the same arguments Brunell makes against I-1631.

In short, no carbon tax exists that Brunell could support because he simply does not support actual, real carbon taxes and only raises other carbon taxes as a means to undermine the current proposals on the table.

Brunell and the AWB and Rob McKenna (Chevron employee) and the oil companies who are funding “no on I-1631” do not care about you, your family or the future of Washington state. They care about protecting their investments in dirty fossil fuels, and they care so much that they’re willing to let your child get asthma, watch peoples’ homes go up in smoke, poison the air and the earth, let the seas swamp historic Washington towns, and let famines and disasters kill millions of people around the world.

In November, we have the chance to create something different. I-1631 reorients our economy away from fossil fuels, placing a modest, but rising fee on fossil fuels (analysis suggests that the costs per family per month are around $10). We can grow an economy that’s not based on poison, but on electrification, clean energy, high tech and balancing our relationship with nature.

In short, there’s a future worth having. Don’t let the oil company profits and their paid stooges keep us from it.

– Nathan Schumer




Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@kentreporter.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.kentreporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Letters to the Editor

Some good advice in the fight against infection

School closings, sports event cancellations, food hoarding. … We live in a… Continue reading

City should focus on the real problem, a health crisis

It is time for the city officials of Kent to stop their… Continue reading

How much effect will virus have?

The situation regarding King County’s acquisition of the Econo Lodge in Kent… Continue reading

Coronavirus: County made hasty choice in Kent as a quarantine city

Like many Kent residents, I was blindsided when I heard, late Wednesday… Continue reading

Rapidly rising property taxes poses problem for homeowner

I just received my 2020 King County real estate tax statement and… Continue reading

Let’s set the record straight

A letter published in the Kent Reporter on Feb. 28, “Stop the… Continue reading

We need evidence, measures when considering car tab fee reduction

Most, if not all, state and local government programs can be tested.… Continue reading

Democratic mayors fail to silence shootings

Frank Shiers’ political cartoon (of Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan, Kent Reporter, Jan.… Continue reading

Beware of Legislature investigations

The Legislature’s “investigation” of Rep. Matt Shea (R-Spokane Valley) is alarming. A… Continue reading

Kent gives generously to holiday project

I am writing to thank Kent residents for sharing the true meaning… Continue reading

Large trees are a safety hazard to some homeowners

So somebody in the city wants to plant more trees? They need… Continue reading

Vote yes for Medic One

On the Nov. 5 Ballot will appear “Proposition No. 1. Medic One… Continue reading