Let’s clarify the federal budget process

Regarding Mr. Valentine’s letter (“Shame on us for bringing aboard Trump,” Feb. 8, Auburn Reporter):

Ironically, on Valentine’s day, I will be 83, so Mr. Valentine is my senior. I remember all the presidents since Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I minored in government in college, and I find Mr. Valentine’s comment that President Trump didn’t know that the origin of the yearly budget is the House of Representatives to be ludicrous. Actually, the executive branch submits a proposed budget to Congress, and it is typically called DOA (dead on arrival). Congress and the legislative branch at every level of our government has historically been the least responsible branch of our three branches of government.

Congress is responsible to pass the budget out of both houses and present it to the president to sign or veto. That has not happened.

Those who say the president shut the government down are wrong. The president hasn’t been required to take an action because Congress has not agreed on a budget to present to the president. In recent years, Congress has never produced a budget on time.

Continuing resolutions are not budgets. Congresspersons do not take their responsibility seriously. At least 60 days before the budget is due, Congress should remain in session 12 hours per day, seven days per week until they have a budget agreed by both houses to present to the president. Vacations and foreign trips should be prohibited. Any foreign trip by a Congressperson should be at their personal expense (no lobbyist money). Any such trip by a Congressperson is personal and does not represent the U.S. government. We have only one foreign policy, which is established by the president and the State Department.

President Trump is probably the most qualified president in our history. He has been an executive officer for nearly 50 years, mostly as the chief executive officer. President Obama, having no executive experience, was probably the least qualified. Even as a legislator he dodged tough decisions by voting present, rather than make a decision. That behavior should disqualify any such person from an executive position.

– William Malinski

More in Letters to the Editor

Support Larimer for a promising future

Councilwoman Marli Larimer is the perfect City Council member for Kent’s youth.… Continue reading

Paying too much

Opening the July 12 edition of the Opinion page, I was surprised… Continue reading

Is our country safer loaded with guns?

I find it telling that Mr. Malinski’s May 24 letter (“Stricter gun… Continue reading

Time to act is now to save our planet

“Time is now to embrace Green New Deal” (June 7, Kent Reporter)… Continue reading

A costly effort

Green New Deal, right. Nothing “green” about it – a massive wind… Continue reading

Time is now to embrace Green New Deal

Climate change is happening here and now – recently with record fires… Continue reading

Leadership and homelessness

The KOMO special “Seattle is Dying” validates the homeless crisis. … ”Whether… Continue reading

Trump watch: investigate, don’t impeach him

I believe in investigating Trump. Congress must do this, but I don’t… Continue reading

Senator’s sorry remarks reflect divided Olympia

Sen. Maureen Walsh’s comment about nurses spending their day playing cards after… Continue reading

Really above the law?

Bob Roegner’s article (“Are sheriffs above the law?” Kent Reporter, April 12)… Continue reading

A thank you to Reichert, Schrier for supporting causes

Great to see former Congressman Reichert honored for his hard and often… Continue reading

Let’s look at a balanced, fair tax code

Washington tax laws are unfair and unproportioned. The 1 percent pay 3… Continue reading