Once more, with clarity on gun control

Solomon Hines should do some research on gun control legislation effectiveness. From Harvard, that bastion of extreme Ivy League liberalism, a study published in 2007 Harvard Journal of Law, Titled: Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?, found some surprising things. Here’s a link: beliefnet.com.

Excerpt:

When Kates and Mauser compared England with the United States, they found “a negative correlation, that is, where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are lowest, and where guns are least dense, violent crime rates are highest. There is no consistent significant positive association between gun ownership levels and violence rates.”

In 2004, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences released an evaluation from its review of existing research. After reviewing 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications and its own original empirical research, it failed to identify any gun control that had reduced violent crime, suicide, or gun accidents, note Kates and Mauser.

Anyone can do a Google search of the 10 cities with the highest gun violence rates in the U.S. There is one stark correlation; they are all under control of the Democratic Party for many years. They have some of the toughest gun control laws.

A criminal is one who breaks the law; therefore, a law does not affect a criminal. Enforcement of a law is required for the law to have an effect on a criminal.

“Criminologists of all political persuasions, in over a dozen studies,” writes Bach, “estimate that firearms are used for protection against criminals several hundred thousand to 2.5 million times per year, often without a shot fired.”

A gun control law only disarms law abiding citizens, not criminals. Murder is a far more serious crime than a gun law violation, so why do you think a gun control law would stop a murder?

– William Malinski

More in Letters to the Editor

Large trees are a safety hazard to some homeowners

So somebody in the city wants to plant more trees? They need… Continue reading

Vote yes for Medic One

On the Nov. 5 Ballot will appear “Proposition No. 1. Medic One… Continue reading

At the crossroads with a ‘roundabout’

Do you travel on Willis Street (State Route 516) to commute to… Continue reading

How will you vote?

It’s that time of year during which we are asked to vote… Continue reading

Michaud is the right choice for city council

Zandria Michaud’s top priorities as a Kent City Council member are public… Continue reading

Homeowners, don’t complain about living next to a racetrack

Please remember that Pacific Raceways existed before most of the houses that… Continue reading

Support Larimer for a promising future

Councilwoman Marli Larimer is the perfect City Council member for Kent’s youth.… Continue reading

Support our first responders, vote yes on Prop 1

We all depend on the Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority to provide… Continue reading

Paying too much

Opening the July 12 edition of the Opinion page, I was surprised… Continue reading

Is our country safer loaded with guns?

I find it telling that Mr. Malinski’s May 24 letter (“Stricter gun… Continue reading

Time to act is now to save our planet

“Time is now to embrace Green New Deal” (June 7, Kent Reporter)… Continue reading

A costly effort

Green New Deal, right. Nothing “green” about it – a massive wind… Continue reading