Carbon fee hurts business and families | Brunell

Reduce pollution in our atmosphere without punishing workers and families

Give Gov. Jay Inslee and backers of Initiative 1631 credit. They are persistent in their quest to invoke a fee on carbon emissions. Voters will decide its fate on Nov.6.

Ever since Inslee was first elected, he has pushed to reduce CO2 discharges – a laudable goal. Two years ago, carbon initiative backers drafted a “revenue neutral” ballot measure, which voters rejected by a 59-41 percent margin. Today’s Initiative 1631 simply adds a new fee without cutting any state fee or tax, particularly on gasoline or diesel.

For soccer moms commuting to work and driving kids to after-school practices, and, for small produce company owners dispatching trucks to deliver fresh fruits and vegetables to local supermarkets, the increased costs put a strain on their bank accounts.

I-1631 sets up an appointed commission with a nebulous mission to spend the money under some general guidelines. The politicians are off the hook with their constituents for votes to approve new bureaucracies, taxes and fees.

Furthermore, assessments on carbon emissions automatically increase each year. Under the initiative, which takes effect in 2020, a $15 per metric ton assessment on CO2 goes into effect. That charge ratchets up $2 per ton annually plus inflation until it hits $43 a ton by 2030.

Washington’s Office of Financial Management estimates the carbon tax would raise over $610 million in its first year and jump to $761 million by 2023. OFM pegs the cost to consumers and businesses at $2.3 billion over five years, mostly in higher electric and natural gas bills.

The Washington Policy Center reports the average household would see an annual cost increase of between $234 and $305 in 2020. Over the next decade, its increase range is between $672 and $877.

Soccer moms and delivery companies would feel the brunt of the immediate 14-cent-a-gallon gas tax. Considering Washington motorists already pay nearly 68 cents a gallon in federal and state gas taxes, the added cost from the initiative over 15 years is projected to be 57 cents a gallon.

According to AAA Washington, the average cost of gallon of gas in the state is now $3.44 compared to the national of $2.91.

Last May, Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Analytics, told Politico: “Gas prices mean less today than they did 20 years ago, but they still mean a lot, especially to those folks living on the margins in lower and lower-middle income groups.” The same applies to small business owners.

“Washington businesses are already among the greenest in the world and they continue to look for new ways to reduce their carbon footprint,” Association of Washington Business president Kris Johnson added. “This initiative will do little to reduce global carbon emissions while placing Washington employers, particularly small businesses, at a competitive disadvantage with other states and regions that won’t have to pay the higher energy costs.”

Collectively, we benefit from lowering the volumes of carbon and other greenhouses in our atmosphere. Similarly, we need to ensure that Washington business, farmers and families are not punished with exorbitant energy bills and steep increases in consumer costs.

Establishing a new state agency governed by a non-elected, 15-member board to dole out billions with no specific responsibility to achieve emission goals is a bad idea. Elected officials directly accountable to the voters should be in charge.

Finally, backers of a carbon fee need to look at revenue-neutral proposals. A good place to start is lowering gas taxes simultaneously with implementing carbon taxes. Then we should streamline the administration of carbon programs through existing state and local agencies. In essence, put the notion of a new agency on ice, permanently.

Don Brunell is a business analyst, writer and columnist. He retired as president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization, after over 25 years as its CEO and now lives in Vancouver. He can be contacted at TheBrunells@msn.com.

More in Opinion

Lawmakers on the road to finding car tab relief

One of the last spitball fights among lawmakers in the 2018 session… Continue reading

Your South King County legislators in action

Democrats must be careful to not overplay their hand in Olympia

Snowy winter is here

A winter storm earlier in the week brought a thick blanket of… Continue reading

Controversial 2018 election mailers were audacious – and legal

Misleading postcards didn’t violate election laws because they touted non-candidates, the PDC found

Student debt draining retired income | Brunell

Lots has been written about students exiting college saddled with hefty student… Continue reading

East Coast seaports ramping up capabilities | Brunell

While many eyes are fixed on trade talks between our country and… Continue reading

New year will bring a new libraries, opportunities

On Jan. 16, I will celebrate my one-year anniversary as the King… Continue reading

Viadoom looms

Closure, demolition of

Boeing hopes to build upon record year | Brunell

Last year, a PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) global study of aerospace manufacturing attractiveness found… Continue reading

Lawmakers aim to revisit, scrutinize how Sound Transit works

Sound Transit should count on getting a share of attention from state… Continue reading

Can Seahawks lasso the Cowboys on wild-card weekend?

The Seattle Seahawks look to stay perfect in opening-round playoff games under… Continue reading

Ways to drain the swamp

Many pundits predict American political warfare will worsen in 2019 and grow… Continue reading