Streamlining regulations helps Americans compete | Brunell

President Trump campaigned on cutting taxes, streamlining regulations and improving infrastructure. He also vowed to renegotiate our trade agreements calling the North American Free Trade Agreement “the worst deal ever made.”

On his first day in office, he signed an executive order aimed at reducing regulations and controlling regulatory costs. However, revamping our vast web of federal rules is much easier said than done. It is even more difficult when state and local rules are considered.

The cost of regulations is a key American competitiveness issue. It is a major reason our companies re-locate to other countries and our manufacturers and farmers have difficulties competing internationally.

The U.S. Office of Management and Budget pegged the costs of new regulations passed since 1980 at $250 billion a year. The Competitive Enterprise Institute added annual regulatory compliance and economic impact costs are $1.8 trillion – roughly equal to all of the personal and corporate income tax collections.

In 2014, the National Association of Manufacturers found small manufacturers with fewer than 50 employees pay an estimated $34,671 per employee each year just to comply with federal regulations.

Concern over the impacts of excessive regulations is not new. In the 1980s, Sen. George McGovern, 1972 Democrat presidential nominee, bought the Stratford Inn in Connecticut and learned how difficult it was to operate a small business and comply with government regulations.

“I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day” McGovern wrote in a Wall Street Journal editorial. “That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.”

Those difficulties also frustrate many involved in international trade. Farmers, food processors and factory owners find their compliance costs rising and now face retaliatory trade tariffs (25 percent and 15 percent) on products they export to countries such as China.

Hopefully, tariff rhetoric will not escalate and new approaches can make their way into trade agreement and regulation streamlining negotiations.

For example, Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Steve Daines of Montana and Cory Gardner of Colorado wrote President Trump asking him to add language to NAFTA aimed at streamlining permitting, bolstering infrastructure and putting key regulatory reforms into the agreement.

They want a competitiveness chapter included in NAFTA, which applies only to the U.S. Neither Mexico nor Canada would have to agree or are impacted.

The letter also proposes Congressional approval for any regulation costing more than $100 million. That provision is aimed at presidential executive orders imposing costly new requirements which often skirt the law.

The uniqueness of the Cruz-Daines-Gardner approach is any final trade agreement would then be ratified by the U.S. Senate requiring only 50 votes. It escapes a deadly filibuster.

Tubing NAFTA and adding tariffs hurts our farmers, food processors and manufacturers, especially in our state – the nation’s third largest exporter. In 2017, Washington exports were $77 billion of which $8 billion went to Canada under NAFTA.

In Mexico, the U.S is the dominant dairy supplier, capturing close to 75 percent of that market. Dairy exports to Mexico support 30,000 American jobs. Washington dairies contributes nearly $4 billion a year to the state’s economy and provides 18,000 jobs.

Montana wheat farmers increased their exports to Mexico by 400 percent since NAFTA was signed. Much of that grain is barged down the Snake and Columbia rivers to be exported from Washington ports.

Streamlining regulations and negotiating trade agreements is tedious, necessary work. Cruz-Daines-Gardner suggest a different approach. Hopefully, the president and their colleagues will give it serious consideration. It just may work!

Don Brunell is a business analyst, writer and columnist. He recently retired as president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization, and now lives in Vancouver. He can be contacted at TheBrunells@msn.com.

More in Opinion

In tough month, an ally becomes a competitor for Eyman

After getting signatures for a measure that didn’t qualify, Restore Washington wants to do its own.

Nothing cheesy: Apollo missions brought us more than just the moon

America needed something to bring people together. Apollo 11 accomplished that.

2020 Census and the importance of being counted

Census affects everything from government representation to federal funding.

On the road to recovery to ride again | Dinsmore

A dad never likes to be awakened by a 6 a.m. message… Continue reading

China’s mighty migrating mandate

Country has to get serious about its trash problem as its fast-paced economy expands

Nation sorely lacks positive role models

Our culture has forgotten the importance of role models to future generations

Legislature: History, investigations and new laws

The 2019 session of the Legislature included controversy, compromise, surprise, new law and more.

Max fix critical to Washington

Boeing needs to get the 737 back into service – safely and soon

Gov. Jay Inslee. FILE PHOTO
Governor’s watch: timing is everything

Inslee, possible candidates eye 2020 race

KCLS provides summertime opportunities to read, learn and grow

June is the end of the school year, but it’s the beginning… Continue reading

Could Seattle put on a World’s Fair today? | Brunell

On April 21, 1962, the Seattle World’s Fair opened. The “Century 21… Continue reading