Streamlining regulations helps Americans compete | Brunell

President Trump campaigned on cutting taxes, streamlining regulations and improving infrastructure. He also vowed to renegotiate our trade agreements calling the North American Free Trade Agreement “the worst deal ever made.”

On his first day in office, he signed an executive order aimed at reducing regulations and controlling regulatory costs. However, revamping our vast web of federal rules is much easier said than done. It is even more difficult when state and local rules are considered.

The cost of regulations is a key American competitiveness issue. It is a major reason our companies re-locate to other countries and our manufacturers and farmers have difficulties competing internationally.

The U.S. Office of Management and Budget pegged the costs of new regulations passed since 1980 at $250 billion a year. The Competitive Enterprise Institute added annual regulatory compliance and economic impact costs are $1.8 trillion – roughly equal to all of the personal and corporate income tax collections.

In 2014, the National Association of Manufacturers found small manufacturers with fewer than 50 employees pay an estimated $34,671 per employee each year just to comply with federal regulations.

Concern over the impacts of excessive regulations is not new. In the 1980s, Sen. George McGovern, 1972 Democrat presidential nominee, bought the Stratford Inn in Connecticut and learned how difficult it was to operate a small business and comply with government regulations.

“I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day” McGovern wrote in a Wall Street Journal editorial. “That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.”

Those difficulties also frustrate many involved in international trade. Farmers, food processors and factory owners find their compliance costs rising and now face retaliatory trade tariffs (25 percent and 15 percent) on products they export to countries such as China.

Hopefully, tariff rhetoric will not escalate and new approaches can make their way into trade agreement and regulation streamlining negotiations.

For example, Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas, Steve Daines of Montana and Cory Gardner of Colorado wrote President Trump asking him to add language to NAFTA aimed at streamlining permitting, bolstering infrastructure and putting key regulatory reforms into the agreement.

They want a competitiveness chapter included in NAFTA, which applies only to the U.S. Neither Mexico nor Canada would have to agree or are impacted.

The letter also proposes Congressional approval for any regulation costing more than $100 million. That provision is aimed at presidential executive orders imposing costly new requirements which often skirt the law.

The uniqueness of the Cruz-Daines-Gardner approach is any final trade agreement would then be ratified by the U.S. Senate requiring only 50 votes. It escapes a deadly filibuster.

Tubing NAFTA and adding tariffs hurts our farmers, food processors and manufacturers, especially in our state – the nation’s third largest exporter. In 2017, Washington exports were $77 billion of which $8 billion went to Canada under NAFTA.

In Mexico, the U.S is the dominant dairy supplier, capturing close to 75 percent of that market. Dairy exports to Mexico support 30,000 American jobs. Washington dairies contributes nearly $4 billion a year to the state’s economy and provides 18,000 jobs.

Montana wheat farmers increased their exports to Mexico by 400 percent since NAFTA was signed. Much of that grain is barged down the Snake and Columbia rivers to be exported from Washington ports.

Streamlining regulations and negotiating trade agreements is tedious, necessary work. Cruz-Daines-Gardner suggest a different approach. Hopefully, the president and their colleagues will give it serious consideration. It just may work!

Don Brunell is a business analyst, writer and columnist. He recently retired as president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization, and now lives in Vancouver. He can be contacted at TheBrunells@msn.com.

More in Opinion

Legislature: History, investigations and new laws

The 2019 session of the Legislature included controversy, compromise, surprise, new law and more.

Max fix critical to Washington

Boeing needs to get the 737 back into service – safely and soon

KCLS provides summertime opportunities to read, learn and grow

June is the end of the school year, but it’s the beginning… Continue reading

Gov. Jay Inslee. FILE PHOTO
Governor’s watch: timing is everything

Inslee, possible candidates eye 2020 race

Burgers and fries or trains and rails?

A Sound Transit committee recently removed the Lowe’s/Dick’s site from consideration for… Continue reading

Washington’s big tax bump | Brunell

With the dust settling from the 2019 legislative session, the focus is… Continue reading

State, feds splash and clash over Washington’s water quality

President Donald Trump is ready to give Washington the clean water rules… Continue reading

Washington State Capitol. Photo by Emma Epperly, WNPA Olympia News Bureau
Interim House speaker takes on challenges of a tough seat

The Frank Chopp era is over. Washington’s longest-serving speaker of the state… Continue reading

New Montana law aims to keep people in their homes | Brunell

Montana’s legislature took the unusual step of exempting older, less-valued mobile homes… Continue reading

Democrats doing a victory lap, but other matters remain unfinished

Democratic lawmakers greeted the end of the 2019 legislative session with warm… Continue reading

KCLS fosters connections with local governments and library advocates

King County Library System fosters connections with local governments and library advocates… Continue reading

E-waste reduction requires innovative approaches

The vast majority of e-waste isn’t handled in an environmentally friendly way